It’s no secret to anyone who knows me that I’ve been a bit starved for intellectual conversation in Dubai.
Since moving back here 7 months ago, I’ve been on the lookout for anything that can get me cerebrally turned on. There are some great folks in the city, certainly, but most events in Dubai labelled as ‘cultural’ or ‘artistic’ attract the same type of footfall. There are only so many vapid, self-involved people you can meet before you decide to give up and just stay in and watch re-runs of Friends.
All hope, however, is not lost. Lo and behold the Emirates Lit Fest!
Granted, I don’t think all the authors invited for it (and the list is rather long) are the cat’s pajamas but I’ll stop nitpicking long enough to rejoice that YES, THERE IS CULTURE IN DUBAI (…only when it is imported, but it’s a start).
Today was the 4th day of the festival. The venue was crowded, lots of bookworms milling about, hoping to find a last-minute ticket to the Jeffrey Archer session, which was sold out soon after it went on sale. Thankfully, I didn’t even dream of wanting to attend that one.
What I was looking forward to was catching the talk and reading by Ben Okri, and oh, what a delight it was! The man is a wonderful speaker: soft, thoughtful, and eloquent with words that seem to just glide into the ether and linger there for a while so you can savour them before digesting what they are trying to convey.
His bio is impressive: a Booker prize, novels, short-story/poetry collections, books of essays, even a comparison that denotes him the African counterpart of Marquez and Rushdie. His demeanor, however, was absent of any grandeur and he spoke about some truly wonderful notions surrounding literature. From five pages of notes that I was compulsively scribbling down, there are a plethora of things that really stuck with me.
On being called an ‘African’ writer, Okri shook his head and commented that a people and what they mean cannot be confined to simply one place. With literature, geography becomes transnational. As a teenager, he would devour Plato while his father would often gesture around him with his hands and comment ‘We have our own Platos.’ (Isn’t that just the loveliest image/line?)
The African (and here I could easily insert Pakistani or South Asian, and it would make just as much sense) philosophy and way of seeing reality are in the air. The spirit of a place and its people are not separate from the way in which we live our lives. Thus, writers who write only of where they are from, or who are labelled as where they are from, pose a severe limitation to the scope of what is being written. Where you are from is already implied in your writing as a default, there is no need to make a deliberate effort.
This particular idea really resonated with me. It’s something we often debated in Bilal Tanweer’s workshops at LUMS, the concept of writing ‘ethnic lit’ and representing Pakistan. Making an effort gives you prose that is exoticizing and simply trying too hard, with long English descriptions of the simplest of things such as a paratha (“round, flat bread, fried to a rich golden brown”?) sounding like a justification or an over-explanation for what is normally just a part of your culture that you don’t think twice about. A paratha is a paratha.
Expanding on the burden of representing Africa in his writing, Okri used a great little analogy. We do not find Shakespeare interesting because of his English-ness, we read him because of his humanity. When you read a writer, think beyond their identity and their labels. To approach a piece of writing with a set prejudice in mind is to do it a great disservice. “One of the most effective ways of overcoming prejudice is to write well. Conflicts of the world would be so much easier to deal with if we just read each other.”
Okri also spoke at length about childhood. He described that phase of time as an unusual way of seeing significance in insignificance, a teacher of openness. “If you want to know what a nation is like, look at how they treat their children.” As we grow older, this is what we lose. It becomes difficult to see.
This reminded me a lot of what William Wordsworth puts forth in his poems (Tintern Abbey, and Ode to Intimations of Immortality). He explores childhood as a time when our connection to nature is at its most pristine. Equating Nature with the divine also implies that in childhood, our connection to that which is beyond us is unblemished. Childhood is that idealized state in which a simple sight such as that of a rainbow can excite the mind in wondrous ways. We lose that sense of awe and wonder as we grow older. There was this beautiful moment in the Q&A after the talk when a young girl asked Okri, “What advice would you give to children about writing?” He was flummoxed into silence fro a few minutes before thoughtfully responding, “Read. Read as much and as often as you can. Write, of course, write but read because that comes first.” He paused to ponder before continuing on, “There are moments when Mom or Dad say something amazing. Remember them.” He settled back in his seat and the audience began to applaud. He sat up again and interrupted the moderator to continue, with widened eyes and a feigned look of wonder, “You know that feeling when you see something or someone for the first time? Never lose that.” Needless to say, the entire audience aww-ed and sighed in pleasure.
I also really liked what Okri had to say on ideas. He likened an idea to a seed, it may be small but it contains the potential to be an oak tree. (A lot like Shariati’s idea of the 0 and the 1.) The logic of your idea pours out once you start writing and that is the best kind of writing, that which calls forth out of your soul. A novel doesn’t just happen all at once. “A novel visits you, in a glimpse. Maybe it’s just a glimpse of a woman walking down the street, but what a woman and what a street!”
He described himself as an obsessive re-writer. You cannot know, he said, if a sentence works unless you literally and with full consciousness go over every single word. “The process is sickening.” It requires what Chekhov called the “coldness of the eye”, a sort of distancing yourself from your creation in order to critique it. But this is far from easy.
Personally, I abhor going back to stuff I’ve written in order to edit or re-write. What you write is like your baby, you;re protective of it, you’re halfway in love with it, and incredibly resistant to altering it in any way but it’s necessary. Being secure as a writer is impossible. How can you be secure in a way of being that deals with the most intangible of things? As Okri put it, “Insecurity is a punishment from the gods for the effrontery you commit for wanting to create.”
How gorgeous is that line? Soak it in.
Needless to say, the session was exactly what my soul needed. There are not a whole of other writers I’m particularly looking forward to meeting and hearing, but Ben Okri was definitely one of the highlights. Here are a few bit from some of his poems:
We have broken the night.
The night yields in the rock.
Night leaps out from our hands.
The night has left the sky
As fire and power in our hands.
As a strong shape.
The world is ours at last.
We are as the gods dream.
Haven’t we broken the mountain
And shaped the world
In our own hands, to bend and crack
And change it into form and dream?
We have become more than we seem.
Not sure which poem this was from, but I loved this particular stanza. Made me think of Karachi:
Who can read it,
save the Gods.
But they are quiet now.
They are quiet
And this one:
I held you in the square
and felt the evening
re-order itself around
I could keep gushing about Okri. So I’ll stop now and start reading the collection of his essays that I bought today, ‘A Time for New Dreams’. Indeed.